On a hot summer day, you can lie on the mat and feel the coolness of the summer is also a great summer event. But not everyone can sleep on the floor! See if you have the following situations:
One: When you are cold and cold, you should not sleep when you have a cold.
Second: people with weak constitution and cold stomach qi are not suitable for sleeping;
Three: People with skin diseases such as abscesses should not sleep on a mat;
Four: Diabetic people are not suitable for sleeping.
Because the new mat is easy to rub the skin, and people with diabetes have high blood sugar, bacteria are easy to breed, and it is easy to cause skin infection.
Special attention should be paid to infants and young children. Children's skin is delicate, and some mats contain a allergen, which can easily lead to allergic dermatitis. Some of the mats are interspersed with aphids, which may cause redness, itching, and pain. Some children are fatter and sweat more. Soaking the skin with sweat is also easy to make the skin inflamed.
How to collect mats
After the summer, the collection mat can not use plastic bags, so as not to produce moisture, causing mold and insects. At the same time, the mat cannot be stressed or folded.
Disinfection efficacy testing is usually done with planktonic cells or more recently, biofilms. While disinfectants are much less effective against biofilms compared to planktonic cells, questions regarding the disinfection tolerance of detached biofilm clusters remain largely unanswered. Burkholderia cepacia and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were grown in chemostats and biofilm tubing reactors, with the tubing reactor serving as a source of detached biofilm clusters. Chlorine dioxide susceptibility was assessed for B. cepacia and P. aeruginosa in these three sample types as monocultures and binary cultures. Similar doses of chlorine dioxide inactivated samples of chemostat and tubing reactor effluent and no statistically significant difference between the log(10) reductions was found. This contrasts with chlorine, shown previously to be generally less effective against detached biofilm particles. Biofilms were more tolerant and required chlorine dioxide doses ten times higher than chemostat and tubing reactor effluent samples. A second species was advantageous in all sample types and resulted in lower log(10) reductions when compared to the single species cultures, suggesting a beneficial interaction of the species.
Agriculture Industry Disinfection
Chlorine Dioxide For Aquaculture, Chlorine Dioxide For Poultry, Fish Water Disinfection, Chlorine Dioxide Farm Disinfection
Nanjing Ligong Shuifu Environmental Protection Technology Co.,Ltd. , http://www.watermanclo2.com