Abstract The capital market has been in the forefront for a while, and many famous commercial predators have become the protagonists of large-scale mergers or information mutations. The media talked a lot, and the people who eat melon did not understand it, but most of them followed the analysis of the "scam", the capital of China...
The capital market has been in turmoil for a while, and many famous commercial crocodiles have become the protagonists of large-scale mergers or information mutations. The media talked a lot, and the people who eat melon did not understand it, but most of them followed the analysis of the "scam". China's capital market seems to have a big problem. This is the impression of many people.
Jia Yueting lost the position of the chairman of LeTV. Nowadays, in the United States, public opinion generally thinks that he is "refuge" and compares his actions in the past year with the "Ponzi scheme." Wanda sold 63.2 billion yuan of assets, the financial situation should be better, but many public opinion put Wanda and LeTV together, suspecting that this is a precursor to Wang Jianlin's "to run."
Public opinion on the suspicion of private enterprises' overseas mergers and acquisitions is aggravating. Private enterprises lacking core technological advantages and more overseas mergers and acquisitions seem to lose public trust. Any turmoil will cause those enterprises to intentionally "transfer assets and flee" in a new round. question. The situation in which Chinese companies buy overseas flagship assets in an area that makes the domestic public proud is seemingly gone.
Overseas investment has the dual meaning of commercial expansion and asset risk allocation. The direction of specific overseas mergers and acquisitions depends on the public's understanding of such acquisitions and the degree of trust in the Chinese companies that make acquisitions. It will have an impact on this. The current situation is that public opinion companies have agreed to the acquisition of overseas technology companies. For example, Geely's acquisition of Volvo has been regarded as a successful case. The public's doubts are most concentrated on those projects that can be interpreted as “soft power†overseas.
In addition, there are many complaints from public opinion about the use of leveraged loans such as bank loans by private companies to conduct overseas acquisitions. They also provoked the question of "collusion between government and business."
Now, every time there is a large-scale acquisition, where are the tens of billions of money coming from, why are some investment companies able to incite very strong financial leverage? Among them, there are either “cheating†or “corruptionâ€, and such a cloud is quite common on the Internet.
It cannot be said that Chinese society is still relatively unfamiliar to the operation of large capitals, especially with the help of highly leveraged capital operations. Not only is the public not aware of it, but the regulatory agencies have difficulty in making qualitative estimates for them. The operators themselves are also the first wave of such a thing in China. It is not necessarily clear what they are in front of them. They should say that they are largely risky.
There are already a certain number of companies that have decided to "cheat the bottom" from the very beginning. I am afraid there are very few. At the end of the "Ponzi scheme", I am afraid that there is still an ambitious plan, and there is a good start, and then the market is misjudged, blind expansion, until the capital chain has a problem, forced to "demolition of the East Wall The Western Wall, or a better story, conceals the current dilemma and tries to “re-take it again†until the crisis breaks out and the founder becomes the “standard swindler†in the eyes of the public.
Public opinion continues to be suspicious of investors, which is probably not normal. A lot of arguments may be both "no wind and no waves" and somewhat exaggerated. Whether the capital crocodile caught in the masses can swim out of the saliva of public opinion depends on their true strength. Some may eventually be overwhelmed, but a solid company can withstand the baptism of various rumors and become more tenacious and powerful.
Wanda is one of the largest private enterprises in China. The “light asset strategy†proposed by it in recent years is relatively new to Chinese society. This concept cannot be clearly explained to the public. It can only pass Wanda’s new round of success. To prove. Faced with the constant changes in public opinion and the economic environment, how Wanda can behave and can afford it may have a symbolic significance for the true quality of private enterprises.
Sucralose For E-liquid
E-Liquid Sucralose,Jk Sucralose,Sucralose Sweetener,Liquid Sucralose
QD Cloudy Inernational Pre Ltd , https://www.qdcloudy.com